Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texts From Last Night
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Texts From Last Night (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
nn websiteLocalteche (talk) 20:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Are you serious? This clearly meets criterion #1 at WP:WEB as the site has "been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." See here and here. And that's just from the references, which not only means there might be more information about this site out there, but also suggests that you haven't even looked at the article. I wouldn't be surprised if you haven't; you've hardly bothered to give a decent nomination reason. POKERdance talk/contribs 22:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep: article cites a few sources. They're not terrific, but those should establish that the website isn't totally non-notable. Also per Pokerdance's comments. — DroEsperanto (talk) 23:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (as the creator of the article). It meets the notability requirements for websites. hmwitht 19:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I added many more references and some more information (diff). WP:The Heymann Standard? hmwitht 20:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:14, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - references to non-trivial coverage in reliable sources, enough to meet Wikipedia:Notability (web). --BelovedFreak 22:17, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.